From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 26 4:26:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992EA37B417 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 04:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 639AFA809; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:25:56 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFAD5434; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:25:56 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:25:56 +1100 (EST) From: Andrew To: Volker Stolz Cc: Ian , Subject: Re: idprio In-Reply-To: <20020326121046.A3952@margaux.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Message-ID: <20020326232510.A21338-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Volker Stolz wrote: > Under FreeBSD system calls are currently never preempted, therefore non- > realtime processes can starve realtime processes, or idletime processes > can starve normal priority processes. Even so an idprio process can't be worse than a normal process. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message