From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 18:03:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D17106566C; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:03:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3705F8FC24; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 5A5221E00130; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:03:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o23I2KVi005644; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:02:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o23I2K9c005643; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:02:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:02:20 +0100 (CET) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <201003031802.o23I2K9c005643@triton8.kn-bremen.de> To: alfred@freebsd.org X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.emulation In-Reply-To: <20100301145840.GL50395@elvis.mu.org> Organization: home Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there an equiv of Linux KVM for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:03:38 -0000 In article <20100301145840.GL50395@elvis.mu.org> you write: >Is there an equivalent to Linux's "KVM" (Kernel Virtual Machine) >for FreeBSD? > >For reference, it appears that Linux KVM's homepage is here: >http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page > There once was a SoC project, but it never reached ports and now would need to be updated at least: http://wiki.freebsd.org/FabioChecconi/PortingLinuxKVMToFreeBSD >Specifically anything that allows QoS of percent of the host >machine's CPU to be allocated? Hmm I didn't know that Linux KVM could do that even... Juergen