From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Oct 4 11:50:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA10221 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 11:50:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from iplink.net (iplink.net [192.139.81.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA10209 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 11:50:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alexp@iplink.net) Received: from alexp@localhost by caesar.iplink.net id <26990-6657>; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 15:40:05 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 15:40:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Alex Perel To: "Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=" cc: "James D. Butt" , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device Drivers for Linux and Intel's annoucement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 4 Oct 1998, Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote: > "James D. Butt" writes: > > http://www.microsoft.com/backstage/column_T2_1.htm > > Yuck. Who are these Weak & Wanker people anyway? This is so > warm-n-fuzzy-feel-good I might just puke. What really bugs the hell out of me is Microsoft's attitude that they invented load balancing solutions using a single IP. I think someone has to wake them up to the realities of NAT, and products such as Cisco's LocalDirector (which btw can do the job96237589235x better than any NT server ever could). Oh and speaking of 100% availability, none of my machines get unscheduled downtime.. hmmm.. I wonder why Microsoft's do. That's my $0.02 Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message