Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:54:05 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance Message-ID: <20150817115405.GL1872@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAF-3MvM8-%2BKxP3xr4vF2=c7o4vqCRdPkzQWjHLECzf3Jx8sqxw@mail.gmail.com> References: <1D52028A-B39F-4F9B-BD38-CB1D73BF5D56@cs.huji.ac.il> <20150817094145.GB3158@zxy.spb.ru> <197995E2-0C11-43A2-AB30-FBB0FB8CE2C5@cs.huji.ac.il> <20150817113923.GK1872@zxy.spb.ru> <CAF-3MvM8-%2BKxP3xr4vF2=c7o4vqCRdPkzQWjHLECzf3Jx8sqxw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote: > On 17 August 2015 at 13:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > > > In any case, for 10Gb expect about 1200MGB/s. > > Your usage of units is confusing. Above you claim you expect 1200 I am use as topic starter and expect MeGaBytes per second > million gigabytes per second, or 1.2 * 10^18 Bytes/s. I don't think > any known network interface can do that, including highly experimental > ones. > > I suspect you intended to claim that you expect 1.2GB/s (Gigabytes per > second) over that 10Gb/s (Gigabits per second) network. > That's still on the high side of what's possible. On TCP/IP there is > some TCP overhead, so 1.0 GB/s is probably more realistic. TCP give 5-7% overhead (include retrasmits). 10^9/8*0.97 = 1.2125
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150817115405.GL1872>