From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:59:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC131065672; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:59:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20120215164722.GA1693@vniz.net> <201202171332.23968.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201202171332.23968.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202171659.47078.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Andrey Chernov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-f10-flashplugin11 not works for 9-stable (Linuxulator?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:59:55 -0000 On Friday 17 February 2012 01:32 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > This "invalid" in sockaddr looks familiar as for some time ago > > added sockaddr length checks our kernel, but as bz@ says this > > should be already fixed. > > Yes, it should be fixed *before* 9.0-RELEASE. I meant 9.0 was released with the fix. Sorry if I caused confusion. Jung-uk Kim