From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 17 23:02:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24ABE16A416 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C266043D5F for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:02:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9HN2R6B055868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:02:28 -0800 (AKDT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <45356102.5030604@mac.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:02:26 -0800 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com, FreeBSD-questions References: <80f4f2b20610151556l18c5adcci4196ab107b6b9907@mail.gmail.com> <4533C553.3040609@schrodinger.com> <20061017135829.GA56234@gothmog.pc> <20061017153004.M88574@envieweb.net> <453512C8.4030900@schrodinger.com> <20061017224847.GA14477@lakshmi.susmita.org> In-Reply-To: <20061017224847.GA14477@lakshmi.susmita.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: What's so compelling about FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:02:31 -0000 On 2006/10/17 14:48, Girish Venkatachalam seems to have typed: > But there is no gainsaying the fact that at least my hardware is > supported albeit buggily or ineffectively... I don't mean to be rude, but if hardware support is your only criteria, why not just run Windows? If you don't care that its buggy or ineffective, and you don't want to check that it is supported before you buy it, you just want it to support everything, it would seem to me that Microsoft's OS is the obvious choice....