Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 16:50:33 -0600 From: John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> To: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@donnerhacke.de> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of the isboot (iBFT / iSCSI boot) module Message-ID: <67358F33-A435-40BE-8DD7-8020BD85E3FF@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <20210608190919.GA31862@belenus.iks-jena.de> References: <97C74347-2181-4B10-A97D-823D42AFEB11@jnielsen.net> <20210608190919.GA31862@belenus.iks-jena.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Jun 8, 2021, at 1:09 PM, Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@donnerhacke.de> = wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 12:22:41PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote: >> 2) Bring it in base but keep it separate from sys/dev/iscsi. >=20 > First step to bring it in. >=20 >> 3) Bring it in base, but make it depend on the sys/dev/iscsi code. >=20 > Second step, now with a background already in base. This way it's more > likely to catch attention of other devs in the review. >=20 >> 4) Bring it in base and merge it with sys/dev/iscsi. >=20 > Third step, will take time and needs cooperation. Given the previous = step > will cause obvious integration requests, development from more than = one > person is possible. That all sounds reasonable. Where do I go from here? Put the code on = Phabricator?=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?67358F33-A435-40BE-8DD7-8020BD85E3FF>