From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 31 13:04:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247D016A4E7
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:04:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5765643D60
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:04:49 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from ben@spooty.net)
Received: from [80.1.84.172] by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
          id <20041031130245.XLMB24841.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@[80.1.84.172]>;
          Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:02:45 +0000
From: Ben Paley <ben@spooty.net>
To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:05:47 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <200410281902.47158.ben@spooty.net> <xzp4qkbq2sp.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <xzp4qkbq2sp.fsf@dwp.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200410311305.47762.ben@spooty.net>
cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: USB - erratic function, no printing!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:04:50 -0000

On Saturday 30 October 2004 23:06, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> Ben Paley <ben@spooty.net> writes:
> > su-2.05b# lptest 20 10 > /dev/ulpt0
>
> Please try using /dev/unlpt0 instead.

I thought I had mentioned - /dev/unlpt0 does nothing at all, even less=20
than /dev/ulpt0 (which is not much).

I have found several mentions of similar problems on the net, going back a =
few=20
years, but no solutions. I am stumped!

But thanks for yor reply anyway - It's very nice to know somebody else is=20
thinking about it.

Cheers,
Ben