From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 18:50:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D2D1065670 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7DE8FC1C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p56Io7Ws064700 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:50:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p56Io7jE064699; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:50:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:50:07 GMT Message-Id: <201106061850.p56Io7jE064699@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Chris Rees Cc: Subject: Re: bin/155034: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Rees List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:50:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/155034; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees To: jh@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/155034: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:42:49 +0100 n 6 June 2011 19:20, wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: jh > State-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 18:04:17 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > Not a bug. As far as I can see ignoring the signal would violate POSIX: > > "For SIGINT, the dd utility shall interrupt its current processing, > write status information to standard error, and exit as though > terminated by SIGINT. It shall take the standard action for all other > signals; - -" > Clear and unambiguous wording, thank you very much for sorting this! Chris