From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 00:10:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AD316A403 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [213.225.74.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0AD13C478 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from [212.62.248.147] (helo=[192.168.2.10]) by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HPSHL-000CDD-W4 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:44:14 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3FCD4E86-40CA-4E27-AF97-DFB94F02077C@anduin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: stable@freebsd.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:44:03 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Subject: Panic: spin lock smp rendezvous ... held too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:10:42 -0000 Hi all, I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID controller. It has been working OK (although I suspect the asr driven, being giant-locked, is very inefficient) for a little while, but as I was extracting a bunch of tarballs it paniced like so: spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc9d54600 for > 5 seconds panic: spin lock held too long cpuid = 0 I don't have a dump device (though I'm setting that up for the next reboot). However, I have tried turning off HT, to see if that might help. Does this look familiar to anyone? Or do I need to produce more data if it happens again? Thanks, /Eirik