From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 16:50:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB5D1065679 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD68D8FC22 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB1Go3H8023038 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nB1Go3R4023037; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200912011650.nB1Go3R4023037@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Oleg V. Nauman" Cc: Subject: Re: bin/40282: [patch] kill(1) has bad error checking for command line parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Oleg V. Nauman" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/40282; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Oleg V. Nauman" To: Jilles Tjoelker Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, oleg@reis.zp.ua Subject: Re: bin/40282: [patch] kill(1) has bad error checking for command line parameters Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:14:29 +0200 Hello Jilles, Thank you for looking into this. Your patch is fine, but it raises the next questions: do we really want to keep historical kill(1) behavior regarding processing on the rest of list of PIDs when an error occurs? Both of proposed patches ( mine and you ) just break this historical behavior. Well I think that breaking the ( bad ) things is the fine thing. Please commit your patch. Thank you. On Sunday 08 November 2009 19:10:31 you wrote: > So I suggest this patch (EX_USAGE vs 1 can be changed separately). > > -- > Jilles Tjoelker > > Index: bin/kill/kill.c > =================================================================== > --- bin/kill/kill.c (revision 198703) > +++ bin/kill/kill.c (working copy) > @@ -123,10 +123,9 @@ > > for (errors = 0; argc; argc--, argv++) { > pid = strtol(*argv, &ep, 10); > - if (!**argv || *ep) { > - warnx("illegal process id: %s", *argv); > - errors = 1; > - } else if (kill(pid, numsig) == -1) { > + if (!**argv || *ep) > + errx(1, "illegal process id: %s", *argv); > + else if (kill(pid, numsig) == -1) { > warn("%s", *argv); > errors = 1; > } >