Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 16:11:25 -0700 From: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> To: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: 11.0 under virtualbox: Going from -r302180 to -r302331 required emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions rebuild despite 1100120 being unchanged Message-ID: <35F3C0EE-789C-4F08-A2C0-BCAF467D88CC@dsl-only.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[The ports had recently been updated to -r417989 and a "portupgrade -Wa" = had run to completion before the following FreeBSD 11.0 -r302180 to = -r302331 upgrade was started.] On Mac OS X 10.11.5 using FreeBSD 11.0 -r302331 under VirtualBox 5.0.24 = r108355 after upgrading from FreeBSD 11.0 -r302180: The upgrade to = -r302331 required me to rebuild emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions in = order to get lumina to work again. Without the rebuild lumina just made = a black screen and kept the cores 100% busy. Even a ACPI Shutdown = selection did not stop it: I had to use more drastic means. I did not rebuild lumina, just emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions . (As = configured I manually type startx to get lumina. So I easily rebooted = and worked form the console to rebuild = emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions and then reboot again to try lumina.) FYI, from after the 11.0 upgrade: > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD FreeBSDx64 11.0-ALPHA6 FreeBSD 11.0-ALPHA6 #5 r302331M: Sun = Jul 3 14:41:34 PDT 2016 = markmi@FreeBSDx64:/usr/obj/clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-NODEBUG = amd64 amd64 1100120 1100120 But the "1100120 1100120" was the same before when it was at -r302180M. I do remember at least one request/suggestion of a __FreeBSD_version = bump that was never taken: > svn commit: r302283 - head/sys/net80211 >=20 > Bryan Drewery bdrewery at FreeBSD.org=20 > Wed Jun 29 17:36:29 UTC 2016 > . . . > On 6/29/16 10:25 AM, Andriy Voskoboinyk wrote: > > NOTE: Since this change breaks KBI, all wireless drivers need to = be > > recompiled. >=20 > __FreeBSD_version should probably be bumped in sys/sys/param.h >=20 > --=20 > Regards, > Bryan Drewery (I do not claim that -r302283 was involved in my issue, just that there = was apparently at least one reason to bump the number up.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35F3C0EE-789C-4F08-A2C0-BCAF467D88CC>