From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:21:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B2B16A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:21:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (corbulon.video-collage.com [64.35.99.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA0043D1F; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:21:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from 250-217.customer.cloud9.net (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11])i0DLL65N096868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:21:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0DLKwYY059716; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:20:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com Organization: Murex N.A. To: Doug White , Don Lewis Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:20:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401122229.i0CMTb7E034275@gw.catspoiler.org> <20040113090158.B63000@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20040113090158.B63000@carver.gumbysoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401131620.57634@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:14:41 -0800 cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: core-dumping over NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:21:12 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Don Lewis wrote: =OK, I'll tive it a try. NFS between different FreeBSD versions in my =pile-o-machinery have all come up OK, but I'll try against redhat. In my case, the data was coming in over gigabit ethernet. Although 4Mb/s is not hard even with a 100BaseT. What about panic on the client trying to dump core? -mi