Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:59:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS Message-ID: <20010616115849.O4483-100000@wonky.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <200106161856.f5GIujt01283@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > > : > :Greetings, > : > :Here is a surprisingly unbiased article comparing OSes running hard core > :network apps. The results are kind of disturbing, with FreeBSD (4.2) > :coming in last against Linux (RH), Win2k, and Solaris (Intel). > > This is old. The guys running the tests blew it in so many ways > that you might as well have just rolled some dice. There's a slashdot > article on it too, and quite a few of the reader comments on these > bozos are correct. I especially like comment #41. Don't worry, > FreeBSD stacks up just fine in real environments. Disagree wrt NFS services. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010616115849.O4483-100000>