Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:17:32 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: libreoffice fails to build
Message-ID:  <50085D4C.60901@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20488.23232.578561.75939@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
References:  <20486.55903.34769.952614@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <500729B3.1050208@FreeBSD.org> <20487.20506.88401.623249@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <CADLo83-0gak%2B8kBpmg6jUdeHcrYC65CEqCg1SciFe5TXiceM6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sPkuPTt0BtWNoavA-o2FRbEPjwRL88bzR_pC5qyNJenw@mail.gmail.com> <20488.23232.578561.75939@jerusalem.litteratus.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote:
...
> 	Let me be clear:
> 	There is at least one person out there who has successfully
> built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2?

The version of clang in base is 3.1.  I have successfully compiled
LibreOffice with it, and it even seemed to run OK, though I didn't test
it very thoroughly.  There were several other posters which confirmed
the same.

Apparently in r301038, jkim updated the libreoffice port to use the
lang/clang-devel port instead, which is built from a very recent 3.2
snapshot.  I have no idea if LO compiles successfully with that.  Maybe
you found a problem with the clang-devel port. :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50085D4C.60901>