From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  9 11:06:12 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA14482
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 11:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA14438
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 11:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.8.2/8.8.2) id UAA00348; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 20:03:26 +0100 (MET)
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Message-Id: <199611091903.UAA00348@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Subject: Re: Inetd mod.. comments?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.961106202843.13795A-100000@misery.sdf.com> from Tom Samplonius at "Nov 6, 96 08:29:31 pm"
To: tom@sdf.com (Tom Samplonius)
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 20:03:26 +0100 (MET)
Cc: julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Tom Samplonius wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > I have some patches to Inetd her that I sent out for comment.
> > the only comment I got was
> > "Gee that's neat!, I need that"
> > 
> > but no technical reviews or code checks..
> 
>   xinetd has done this for long time already.  Why not use that?

I still like to see Julian's patch. The reason is that I don't really
trust xinetd. It is too big.

-Guido