Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 17:00:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/66230: Mk/bsd.*.mk: inconsistent tab settings Message-ID: <200405040000.i4400hoG074278@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/66230; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/66230: Mk/bsd.*.mk: inconsistent tab settings Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 18:52:30 -0500 (CDT) On Tue, 4 May 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > - Tell me that CVS history is more important that misaligned lines. CVS history is more important than misaligned lines. Sorry, no smiley available. Anytime you have CVS IDs in the 200-500 range, unless there is an absolutely overwhelming reason to change things, it's already too late, no matter how brain-damaged the original indentation was. IMHO. If this doesn't convince, then please think about the >80 PRs that affect these files, whose patches will suddenly cease to apply cleanly. (Almost all of them apply against bsd.port.mk, which is the most problematic in terms of the indentation; it is also the one with the highest CVS ID). This is not to mention all the local PRs that people have against bsd.port.mk. (I have heard in the past that some people don't submit some local PRs against the framework because the queue is so long. I, myself, have no firm data on this). Disclaimer: yes, I am one such person, but my changes are fairly modular -- it is others that I would expect to have worse problems. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405040000.i4400hoG074278>