From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 22:11:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1FA16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8882B43D69 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FADpF-0000qc-ID; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:11:41 +0300 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FADna-0003IH-6R; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:09:58 +0300 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20060214065106.GC60487@xor.obsecurity.org> <18812948@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060217214724.GA72891@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:09:58 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20060217214724.GA72891@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:47:25 -0500") Message-ID: <70655769@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports-amd64@FreeBSD.org: linux_base-rh-9 failed on amd64 7] X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:11:43 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:47:25 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:42:35AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:51:07 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > FYI; can you please investigate and/or report to the developers? If > > > you are already aware of this problem but do not yet have a fix, > > > please mark the port BROKEN in the appropriate case, so that users do > > > not unexpectedly encounter it. > > > > Can't reproduce. I mark the link that worked for me. > The single working master site was apparently full at the time of > fetch. Clearly the list of master sites needs to be updated :-) Great idea! Let me think about it... ;-) WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider