Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 20:08:29 +0200 (MET DST) From: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl> To: witr@rwwa.com (Robert Withrow) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Test/Release cycle. Message-ID: <199508311808.UAA01379@yedi.iaf.nl> In-Reply-To: <199508311409.KAA07635@spooky.rwwa.com> from "Robert Withrow" at Aug 31, 95 10:09:37 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> short 12 day Test/release time for 2.0.5. The Alpha was released > and 12 days later 2.0.5 was released. > > I wonder if I am alone in thinking that that is *way* too short > of a time? I wonder if the release team tends to get a bad > case of release itis? Don't know about release-itis, but I second your opinion about the tight timeframe. However, I think this related to the fact that 2.0R was considered a BAD THING(tm) or at least much less than optimal quality. Wilko _ __________________________________________________________________________ | / o / / _ Wilko Bulte email: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl |/|/ / / /( (_) Private FreeBSD site - Arnhem - The Netherlands --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508311808.UAA01379>