From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 12:47:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1DE16A49E for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C48643DE2 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 29480 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2006 12:39:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 6 Dec 2006 12:39:47 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <4576BA59.8070603@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:40:57 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: python 2.3 binary package bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:47:10 -0000 I installed this binary package ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/python23-2.3.5_1.tbz on my freebsd 6.1 system and while testing had a problem related to /usr/local/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/_socket.so (it didn't appear to be there). When I build from the source of the package it seems OK. Is this a bug? The binary install mentioned certain bits might be missing, but socket wasn't one of them. If it is a bug what's the reporting mechanism? -- Robin Becker