From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 27 16:38:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C05AA1F2FD for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:984:78b5:1:21b:78ff:fea8:3f22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED4E2162C; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t9RGcPBT093001; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:38:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz@biertje.skysmurf.nl) Received: (from fonz@localhost) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t9RGcPOt093000; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:38:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:38:24 +0100 From: "A.J. \"Fonz\" van Werven" To: Kubilay Kocak Cc: FreeBSD ports mailing list Subject: Re: Help needed: ports builds on 10.X but breaks on 9.X Message-ID: <20151027163824.GA92990@biertje.skysmurf.nl> References: <20151003090630.GA14086@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <20151025151605.GA13444@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <562CF667.1030007@FreeBSD.org> <20151027144304.GB92455@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <562F9F1B.3050303@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <562F9F1B.3050303@FreeBSD.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:38:28 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kubilay Kocak wrote: > The real question that informs the decision is: Might/Do the people > using the quarterly want/need this? [snip] > A really way to get a better feel is to browse the quarterly commit log: >=20 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2015Q4/?view=3Dlog >=20 > However, if you're unsure, it's appropriate to set the merge-quarterly > flag to ? *any time* you think that (or are not entirely sure whether) a > change/issue may need to be committed to quarterly. Really. >=20 > We'd rather quarterly become high value and deal with a few more issues > that have the flag incorrectly set (and deny the request), than missing > commits/fixes that go into head that should be merged, but aren't. Thanks a bunch, it looks pretty clear to me. AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWL6iAAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe80DMP/1J2Ocggod3bPH4uLyA8KcjG BFcFbLPXY1/kqgtOwd/sGU8d3qGcE+YwLcsYUcfexO0DkQ0JZyuObFBtPkhc0eQM GHViC9k+WiodYlCFNMkrgv8GHT0DCkpEQuZuXHiXOqESihxGeqQASAG9QiZ+mp56 Ht9JjbKTDheYD2XgE24Rv1wFAHrMYkDCtUwViDXB0SNWmfIK5VH6M3xQKgrZzM8Q PbmwbwvsVO6I8HzsxRgw6i4EYMpyEEJXSDjCBXNy1hjgK02BnPozAfEgY3+D9eiR nz+YTK/evg3+oR7s33AMtrh5j4qPvCJFJVLzdriDx5zeM4qNj5o++9na+YH3v6yg g/vGeed29CNpo/CHBYrEDtQGEZ/q/rpskNP3ezsv3w2EX1Ey1D7Vv4lBjv4K6Dyx opj5dSNIwOqK34YQNbNa6ha5cm2ftRdGGxJVSdK2M/GTNTo0XRwDjBCxPfQztY0/ 0MmAg5dZ5eodXgpQAib0yJCSgg/JzZOmzo3kecWZWQ9W0yAUMrsYnhA2B5A3907G vRatNWSvsefxElJnYLd2nhFpUJvUUzf2QrGFpS8mb69kn+MR/yfkJ6oc4fd3Q8Gz d1h/Uk4MPn5QrBnpaTx0Jde6sWps+pU5Zq3d9GCPWUNBRm+il7URdPd55ZI+aO4j SdZXzNmDlCiXeVZvQhlH =GBMG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--