From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 26 12:38:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA09287 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (root@sasami.jurai.net [206.151.208.162]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA09282 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 12:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA24614; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 14:38:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 14:38:39 -0500 (CDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Bradley Dunn cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 128k ISDN vs. T1 In-Reply-To: <199608261912.PAA21209@ns2.harborcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Bradley Dunn wrote: > Hmmm...Would one be able to bring PRI in over two T1s and use only one of > the 48 channels as a D? Or would you still need a backup D on the second > T1? What kind of termination equipment is necessary, would a Cisco AS5200 > work? I'd strongly reccomend you always have a primary and a backup on each chassis. You can loose one or the other (but not both). Single points of failure really suck. Have a good one. | Matthew N. Dodd | winter@jurai.net | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | | Technical Manager | mdodd@intersurf.net | http://www.intersurf.net | | InterSurf Online | "Welcome to the net Sir, would you like a handbasket?"|