From owner-freebsd-net Fri May 19 13:28:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from arf.bussert.COM (arf.bussert.com [209.183.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EB837B5FA for ; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:28:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matheny@bussert.com) Received: from localhost (matheny@localhost) by arf.bussert.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA89359; Fri, 19 May 2000 15:55:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matheny@bussert.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:55:53 -0500 (EST) From: Blake Matheny To: Tom Frontera Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 nics in web server giving problems. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The firewall has 2 nic's, one nic is connected to the public hub. The other nic is connected to a seperate private hub using 10.10.10.x as it's ip range. I think those entries from 209.183.78.163 are when I tried to ssh in from behind that firewall. I don't think the firewall is coming into play with those error messages though. Thanks. Blake Matheny Bussert Consulting Network Engineer (765)423-2100 matheny@bussert.com On Fri, 19 May 2000, Tom Frontera wrote: > You can't have the same ip#'s accross two different networks. The NAT nic > card should use private ip space like 192.168.*.* and will act like the > gateway to your 209.183.78.* network... does that make sense? > > Tom Frontera > Sys Admin > (805)684-6060 ext 208 > http://www.valueclick.com/ > > On Fri, 19 May 2000, Blake Matheny wrote: > > > Hi, I have 2 network cards (pci 10/100 intel pro's) in a web server > > running freebsd 3.4. I get messages periodically (at the bottom of the > > email). This didn't happen before I put the second nic in. My ip set up: > > 209.183.78.161 Gateway(router) > > 209.183.78.163 A Firewall > > 209.183.78.164 NIC 1 in Web Server > > 209.183.78.165 NIC 2 in Web Server > > Everything is plugged into the same hub (Switched HP 10Base hub) and the > > firewall has 2 nics with 1 of them plugged into the hub, the other doing > > NAT for a private network. Anyone have any insight as to what these > > 'errors' might be? Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Blake Matheny > > Bussert Consulting > > Network Engineer > > (765)423-2100 > > matheny@bussert.com > > > > ---------Begining of Mail Output-------- > > checking setuid files and devices: > > > > > > checking for uids of 0: > > root 0 > > toor 0 > > > > > > checking for passwordless accounts: > > > > > > web.in2600.com kernel log messages: > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.161 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:00:0c:6d:98:c4 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.162 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d9:7c on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.162 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d9:7c on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.164 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:27:9c:3e:29 on fxp1 > > arp: 209.183.78.163 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:50:04:a5:d7:af on fxp1 > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message