From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri May 9 14:50:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA00676 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Fri, 9 May 1997 14:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.pi.net (root@mailhost.pi.net [145.220.3.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA00671 for ; Fri, 9 May 1997 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kinchenna (asd181.pi.net [145.220.192.181]) by mailhost.pi.net (8.8.3/8.7.1) with SMTP id XAA09931 for ; Fri, 9 May 1997 23:49:35 +0200 (MET DST) Posted-Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 23:49:35 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 23:07:32 +0100 From: Guido Kollerie Subject: Common Access Method && SCSI drivers To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Z-Mail Pro 6.1 (Win32 - 021297), NetManage Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, I asked this little while back but didn't got a response. I'm still curious though so I'll ask it again. How is the implementation of the Common Access Method (CAM) proceeding? Will it be a real CAM implementation or will it just be based on it? And what about the current SCSI drivers, which of them are being (or will be) modified to adher to CAM? A more or less related question. Which of SCSI drivers are being actively maintained. Judging from the amount of traffic Adaptec related driver questions (and answers) generate, I know the Adaptec driver is. Tekram has written it's own, and Simon Shapiro is working on a DPT driver. But what about the other SCSI drivers? -- Guido Kollerie