From owner-freebsd-isp  Tue Oct  8 10:30:52 1996
Return-Path: owner-isp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA08765
          for isp-outgoing; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 10:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from noc.msc.edu (noc.msc.edu [137.66.12.254])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA08741;
          Tue, 8 Oct 1996 10:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uc.msc.edu by noc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0.1(920324))
	id AA24030; Tue, 8 Oct 96 12:30:28 -0500
Received: from fergus-26.dialup.prtel.com by uc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0z(901212))
	id AA25323; Tue, 8 Oct 96 12:30:23 -0500
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.Think.COM (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA28347; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 12:31:30 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 12:31:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
Message-Id: <199610081731.MAA28347@compound.Think.COM>
To: nadav@barcode.co.il
Cc: fvarnell@znet.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: atapi
References: <325A6445.52E@sd.znet.com>
	<Pine.BSF.3.91.961008174404.13304A-100000@gatekeeper.barcode.co.il>
Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth Nadav Eiron on Tue, 8 October:
: Well, from what I've heard, Compaqs are known PCI trouble makers, so that's 
: not such a good choice.

I'll second that baseless rumor.  I wonder about the Dell SDRAM
systems, though.  Any experience out there?