Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:47:24 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Andrew Beals <bandy@cinnamon.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation? Message-ID: <20040526234722.GB8208@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <200405262234.i4QMYFwP027591@cinnamon.com> References: <200405262234.i4QMYFwP027591@cinnamon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Andrew Beals wrote: > Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD=20 > distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does=20 > everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? This isn't Linux. :-) POP servers are neither traditional BSD software nor useful to the majority of FreeBSD systems so they live in ports. There are quite a large number of them there in the mail category. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtSyHXY6L6fI4GtQRAn8YAKDgwbbesEHO7vq891rJ73XZumwqPgCg5DOV A7srVwvA86/74xoNKwk9CW0= =diMr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040526234722.GB8208>