Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate Message-ID: <slrnfuk3lf.egh.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> References: <slrnfud9lu.1rus.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <47E79636.1000909@FreeBSD.org> <47E7EAA8.7020101@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Julian Elischer! On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:53:44 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate': > here are some of my ideas for ipfw changes: > 1/ redo locking so that packets do not have to get locks on the > structure... I have several ideas on this Currently the main need for locking arises for rule byte/packet counters. The easiest short-term solution > 2/ allow separate firewalls to be used at different parts of the > network stack (i.e allow multiple taboe sto co-exist) Umm, could you explain it a little?.. > 3/ possibly keeping per CPU stats.. How that would be represented to user? -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnfuk3lf.egh.vadim_nuclight>