From owner-svn-doc-all@freebsd.org Mon Nov 9 21:15:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-doc-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F9BA29ED0; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 21:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA541DE7; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 21:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 461FFB94F; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:15:37 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: cem@freebsd.org Cc: Benjamin Kaduk , doc-committers@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, svn-doc-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r47757 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/versions Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:51:41 -0800 Message-ID: <1695439.WmNAIbkeWS@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201511071838.tA7IcMGH038876@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:15:37 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: svn-doc-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire doc trees \(except for " user" , " projects" , and " translations" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:15:38 -0000 On Saturday, November 07, 2015 01:15:53 PM Conrad Meyer wrote: > Sounds good to me. I'm new to this document, thanks for your patience. > > Best, > Conrad > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2015, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > >> > It's worth keeping a placeholder entry around for 1100087 (maybe > >> > "incomplete API change to sysctl_add_oid(9); see version 1100089") so that > >> > people don't wonder why there's a gap. > >> > >> On the other hand, there are already big gaps between 1100081 and > >> 1100085, and 1100086 was never documented. Given the relatively short > > > > Not all committers are as responsible as you ;) > > > >> period of time (<1 day) between 1100087 and 1100089 and that this is > >> on CURRENT, not a STABLE branch, I'm incline to leave it alone. Of > >> course if you're really insistent about keeping the 1100087 entry, I > >> can re-add it. (Or if you want to, go ahead. :-)) > > > > I do not insist that you re-add it; you have done plenty already, and > > thank you for it. Probably someone (maybe me) will make a sweep to fill > > in missing pieces at some point. I've retroactively added descriptions for missing version numbers in the past. Even a simple note of "partial change, do not use" would avoid having someone else adding a (likely incorrect) entry for it in the future. -- John Baldwin