From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 19:06:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A950616A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:06:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E443D2F for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:06:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6FB1DD4DA; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:06:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26644-03; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:06:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3471DD428; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:06:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C738C1C00711; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:06:03 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Joe Marcus Clarke Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:06:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502192006.03189.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update of FreeType2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:06:19 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 09:59 +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm thinking about go for the latest FreeType2, now that we are >> unfrozen, with near all apps updated and without any mayor desktop >> change in a while (unless firefox). >> >> someone knows what are mayor showstoppers to this? > > Mozilla and all Mozilla-based ports were the biggest problem. I think > most other ports should be okay by now, but that should be evaluated. That would be nifty, XFree86 4.5 will need newer FreeType (but that will happen after FreeBSD 5.4 most probably). Last time I was fiddling with this, I scavenged patches for Mozillas that seem to be taken from NetBSD pkgsrc, so that could help if it is acceptable given the Mozilla branding. Dejan