From owner-freebsd-gnome  Tue Feb 12 10:58:34 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from omega.lovett.com (omega.lovett.com [209.249.90.123])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3570337B400; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [24.243.55.247] (helo=[10.0.0.2] ident=ident)
	by omega.lovett.com with asmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 16ai4s-0009oO-00; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:54:54 -0800
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:55:42 -0600
Subject: Re: Naming cheme for GNOME2 ports
From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, <gnome@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <B88EC14E.5D8E%ade@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <3C695911.5BAB5E89@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-gnome.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On 02/12/02 12:04, "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> What do people think about naming scheme for the GNOME2 core
> components that already have their GNOME1 counterparts in the tree
> (i.e. gnomefoo-1.x.x vs. gnomefoo-1.99.x)? Should we just add `2'
> suffix, or something like `-devel'? Any ideas are appreciated.

I'd go for the '2' suffix, since we're eventually going to end up with
x11/gnome2 etc.

-aDe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message