From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 13:11:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33209D20 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from systemdatarecorder.org (mail.systemdatarecorder.org [54.246.96.61]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "localhost", Issuer "localhost" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C812B03 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nereid (188-127-209-196.cust.suomicom.net [188.127.209.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by systemdatarecorder.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2ubuntu2.1) with ESMTP id s74D9Qv1028465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:09:27 GMT Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:11:37 +0300 From: Stefan Parvu To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl hw add nphyscpu variable Message-Id: <20140804161137.bb0453ee11197f3db232c645@systemdatarecorder.org> In-Reply-To: <53E023EC.7010001@gentoo.org> References: <20140804145342.2306d7681f0b852908dd4865@systemdatarecorder.org> <53E023EC.7010001@gentoo.org> Organization: systemdatarecorder.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:11:47 -0000 > I think hw.nsocket would make more sense. Whoever does this should > check to see if any other UNIX platforms have picked a suitable name. > even better naming: hw.nsocket so would be nice to have it around. Im reading now kern.sched.topology_spec but will require some work and not sure if I understand it correctly. BTW, what is the process to log a new enhancement for sysctl interface: bugzilla ? -- Stefan Parvu