From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 23:50:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E962616A4CE; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:50:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E6843D5D; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:50:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F55612B140; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:50:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85852-10; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:50:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C865D12B13D; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:50:46 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33FB346198; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:50:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FF346195; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:50:45 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:50:45 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Don Lewis In-Reply-To: <200410010407.i91471ts042635@gw.catspoiler.org> Message-ID: <20041203194816.Q87096@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200410010407.i91471ts042635@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org cc: stable@Freebsd.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: fsck_ffs patch testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 23:50:53 -0000 I'd just like to post a follow up to this, and thanks ... one of our servers crashed tonight, after being up and running for ~67days ... normally, I'd be cursing, because after *that* long, the fsck would take about 12 hours or so ... The server rebooted, fsck'd and dump'd a core file in <60 minutes ... Thanks Don ... On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Don Lewis wrote: > On 30 Sep, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Would you be willing to post a 4.x version of this, or send me one, that I >> can test, since I'm the one that seems lucky to get the "glacially slow" >> fsck's :( > > I was planning on posting a 4.x version sometime after I did the commit > to -CURRENT and it had time to get well exercised by the masses. My > plan is to allow about a month of testing between the commit to -CURRENT > and the MFC. ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664