Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Aug 2003 21:24:05 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD SCSI hackers <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why is an Adaptec 39160 reported as a 3960?
Message-ID:  <20030804192405.GA12688@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <1342110000.1060024588@aslan.btc.adaptec.com>
References:  <20030804181421.GA11345@freebie.xs4all.nl> <1342110000.1060024588@aslan.btc.adaptec.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:16:28PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> > Subject says it all. I just stuck a 39160 (in it's
> > Compaq KZPEA disguise) in my Alpha and it was reported
> > as a 3960D. From:
> 
> There was a marketing change *after* the Compaq cards were
> released to name these cards 39160.  The probe code tries
> to name the products as they were named at release.

<hits forehead> Of course, I should have known. It defies
logic so it must be marketing ;)

tnx
Wilko

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		wilko@FreeBSD.org
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte				



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030804192405.GA12688>