From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 20:50:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3FF16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:50:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFE043D1F for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:50:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from hoppel.local (port-212-202-38-230.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.38.230]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5MKoUOp028705; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:50:30 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596431AF; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:50:25 +0200 (CEST) From: "Bjoern Koenig" To: "'Allan Fields'" Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:50:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRYj/P5Ka22IOclQniHcnufAfuALAACcMGw Message-Id: <20040622205025.596431AF@hoppel.local> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:50:39 -0000 Allan Fields wrote: > What are some other approaches than overlays > for jailed environments? Use NFS instead? You're right. NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very good solution. Works perfectly as expected. I don't know why it didn't cross my mind. Thank you. Bjoern