Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 04:12:22 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd Message-ID: <5A528D36.4020409@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <5A528A87.4050908@quip.cz> References: <76627A89-D7E9-4010-910B-5F25886E7E7E@ellael.org> <5A523873.2050001@quip.cz> <5A524855.2040901@grosbein.net> <5A5284CC.9050400@quip.cz> <5A528749.9070308@grosbein.net> <5A528A87.4050908@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
08.01.2018 4:00, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > PRs are false alibi. Some of my PRs are open for more than 10 years. So were mine when I could not commit fixes myself. This is not excuse to be lazy and not make another one. > For all erroneous port there must be will on maintainer and committer side. > And if "they" think this is not a bug If we have written policy (and we have in this case), and upgrade really break things, sane committer will not think "this is not a bug". Again, do you have a PR with "how-to-repeat" scenario and a patch, so I could take it?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A528D36.4020409>