From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 23:48:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A5437C06C for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:48:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca14-12.ix.netcom.com [205.186.215.12]) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA10018; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 02:47:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id XAA84803; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:45:36 -0700 (PDT) To: John Polstra Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed ldconfig change vs. ports References: <200007140443.VAA59039@vashon.polstra.com> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 13 Jul 2000 23:45:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: John Polstra's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2000 21:43:34 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: John Polstra * Thanks to both you and Ade for the replies. I will go ahead and * commit the change to -current. Unless you advise me otherwise, I'll * keep it out of 4-stable until after 4.1 has been released, just to * avoid causing any big fire drills. Yes, that might be a good idea, thanks! Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message