From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 07:57:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390211065673 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEE78FC1B for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-current@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QaNkW-0004Vu-QI>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:57:52 +0200 Received: from e178025228.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.25.228] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-current@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1QaNkW-0006BT-Nz>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:57:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4E059500.40107@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:57:52 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110622 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.25.228 Subject: LLVM: llvm-as, llvm-ld and so on not contained in FreeBSD core contrib? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:57:54 -0000 Hello. Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm collection but not in FreeBSD's source contribution. I build FreeBSD 9 with CLANG. But as a missing llvm-as and llvm-ld (or llvm-ar) would imply, the binaries are generated via binutils from theGNU suite, aren't they? Sorry for the noise. O.