From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 00:31:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8421E16A4B3; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net (firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB3B43FAF; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:31:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfjup.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.207.217] helo=mindspring.com) by firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ACDSk-0004d1-00; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:31:23 -0700 Message-ID: <3F963221.F3CB296E@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:30:41 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy References: <20031021202618.GE1668@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4d40b21daeaeaab33ec84e332ba5555d2666fa475841a1c7a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Robert Watson cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ethercons: ethernet console driver for 5-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:31:26 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > >As with the Linux driver, communication happens at the ethernet link > >layer, using protocol number 0x0666 (entertaining choice). > > If Linux is using 0x0666, we should probably pick a different number > since we're not wire compatible. Though coming up with a common > protocol would be even better. 0x666 hex is 1638 decimal, and it's taken: cnip 1638/tcp CableNet Info Protocol cnip 1638/udp CableNet Info Protocol Basically, this is just an experimental protocol that's being played with here, and if it ever becomes real, then it will need an IANA protocol number assignment before it's widely deployed. -- Terry