From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:20:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0643616A4CF for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:20:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D551543D1D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j39GKM3C071773 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j39GKMBc071772; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:20:22 GMT Message-Id: <200504091620.j39GKMBc071772@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Erez Zadok Subject: Re: conf/79715: MNT_NODEV should be removed from sys/mount.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Erez Zadok List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:20:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/79715; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Erez Zadok To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" Cc: Erez Zadok , freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/79715: MNT_NODEV should be removed from sys/mount.h Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:18:08 -0400 In message <28785.1113062706@critter.freebsd.dk>, "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: > In message <200504091552.j39FqlT0061068@www.freebsd.org>, Erez Zadok writes: > > > >I maintain am-utils (www.am-utils.org). Users reported some > >problems to me, which I tracked down to a depracated definition of > >MNT_NODEV in sys/mount.h. It was left there, but reset to 0: > > > >#define MNT_NODEV 0 /* Deprecated option */ > > > > I'm perfectly OK with removing it, but didn't out of fear of what > I might break. I guess this was a loose-loose scenario... If the actual NODEV functionallity had been removed from the kernel itself, then older binaries, precompiled with whatever NODEV was before, will get confused b/c users will expect "nodev" to work, but it will silently not work. > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. Thanks, Erez.