Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:03:37 +0200 From: frankie-freebsd@7f000001.org To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Microsoft Network Security Pack Message-ID: <20030730220337.GI19303@kyblik.pieskovisko.sk> In-Reply-To: <44530940421.20030730234005@t-online.de> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030730085801.01a9e5b8@threespace.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730091224.01a28378@threespace.com> <200307302312.09479.nils@thunderbridge.de> <44530940421.20030730234005@t-online.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--R6sEYoIZpp9JErk7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:40:05PM +0200, Andi Scharfstein wrote: > Hi, >=20 > > If you are using Microsoft's eMail clients, some additional caution is= =20 > > probably appropriate - at least you should always watch out for the lat= est of=20 > > their "real" security fixes. But actually, if I were using Windows (I'm= not),=20 > > I'd probably use Pegasus Mail, since that's about the only sane eMail c= lient=20 > > I've seen there. ;-) >=20 > Well, have you seen "The Bat!"? It's astonishingly good :) I agree on > the first part, though. Outlook is *dangerous*. mutt runs on win32, too. And, as we all know, while all mail clients suck, mutt sucks less. m&f --=20 What do you care what other people think? --R6sEYoIZpp9JErk7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQE/KEC54PY2BaN84VwRAgmCAJdDdLF7eZe0q7iCxtRuF1wuJzNFAJ4iE4q0 FsaTd3FgH0YugtwQ7f6G5A== =/gZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R6sEYoIZpp9JErk7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030730220337.GI19303>