Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:52:04 +0200
From:      Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mark Powell <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZfS & GEOM with many odd drive sizes
Message-ID:  <20070721065204.GA2044@garage.freebsd.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20070719181313.G4923@rust.salford.ac.uk>
References:  <20070719102302.R1534@rust.salford.ac.uk> <20070719135510.GE1194@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070719181313.G4923@rust.salford.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:19:14PM +0100, Mark Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>=20
> >On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:19:08AM +0100, Mark Powell wrote:
> >>  What I want to know is, does the new volume have to be the same actual
> >>device name or can it be substituted with another?
> >>  i.e. can I remove, for example, one of the 448GB gconcats e.g. gc1 and
> >>replace that with a new 750GB drive e.g. ad6?
> >>  Eventually so that once all volumes are replaced the zpool could be, =
for
> >>example, 4x750GB or 2.25TB of usable storage.
> >>  Many thanks for any advice on these matters which are new to me.
> >
> >All you described above should work.
>=20
> Thanks Pawel. For your response and much so for all your time spent=20
> working on ZFS.
>=20
> Should I expect much greater CPU usage with ZFS?
>   I previously had a geom raid5 array which barely broke a sweat on=20
> benchmarks i.e simple large dd read and writes. With ZFS on the same=20
> hardware I notice 50-60% system CPU usage is usual during such tests.=20
> Before the network was a bottleneck, but now it's the zfs array. I=20
> expected it would have to do a bit more 'thinking', but is such a dramati=
c=20
> increase normal?

Be sure to turn off debugging, ie. remove WITNESS, INVARIANTS and
INVARIANT_SUPPORT options from your kernel configuration.
Other than that, ZFS may just be more CPU hungry...

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGoa0UForvXbEpPzQRAl5oAKCtt0QPpNfWvPh2aBnIP0I/G/qjuwCgjOQ3
Yp1Kg6GDa1+FasS0vrqdW0U=
=W6Xz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070721065204.GA2044>