From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 21 23:29:26 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0227106566B;
	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:29:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from arundel@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8764C8FC08;
	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:29:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pALNTQtW038333;
	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:29:26 GMT
	(envelope-from arundel@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from arundel@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pALNTQiB038329;
	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:29:26 GMT (envelope-from arundel)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:29:26 GMT
Message-Id: <201111212329.pALNTQiB038329@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gjohnson@srrc.ars.usda.gov, arundel@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: arundel@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: conf/30399: [bsd.cpu.mk] [patch] Have Fortran use the CPUTYPE
	variable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:29:26 -0000

Synopsis: [bsd.cpu.mk] [patch] Have Fortran use the CPUTYPE variable

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: arundel
State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 21 23:24:45 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
I suggest we close this problem report. Fortran now is simply *some* programming
language in ports, after its removal from base. It shouldn't be handled
any differently than any other /usr/ports/lang/*, imo.
Thus it should not be dealt with in bsd.cpu.mk.

Thoughts?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=30399