Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 22:05:01 GMT From: <mustafa@palnet.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=4d=61=74=74=20=44=69=6c=6c=6f=6e?=" <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20=4d=61=74=74=68=65=77=20=48=61=67=65=72=74=79?=" <mhagerty@voyager.net>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS Message-ID: <200106162205.WAA74256@la.palnet.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I didn't believe my eyes
windows is better than FreeBSD..
can't be true
- Original Message --
From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
To: Matthew Hagerty <mhagerty@voyager.net>
Send: 06:56 PM
Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS
:
:Greetings,
:
:Here is a surprisingly unbiased article comparing OSes running hard core
:network apps. The results are kind of disturbing, with FreeBSD (4.2)
:coming in last against Linux (RH), Win2k, and Solaris (Intel).
This is old. The guys running the tests blew it in so many ways
that you might as well have just rolled some dice. There's a slashdot
article on it too, and quite a few of the reader comments on these
bozos are correct. I especially like comment #41. Don't worry,
FreeBSD stacks up just fine in real environments.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
___________________________________
Palnet Webmail, http://www.palnet.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106162205.WAA74256>