From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 16 12:59:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from la.palnet.com (la.palnet.com [192.116.19.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE3E37B405 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:59:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nobody@la.palnet.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by la.palnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA74256; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 22:05:01 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 22:05:01 GMT Message-Id: <200106162205.WAA74256@la.palnet.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=4d=61=74=74=20=44=69=6c=6c=6f=6e?=" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20=4d=61=74=74=68=65=77=20=48=61=67=65=72=74=79?=" , Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS From: Reply-To: Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS X-Originating-Ip: [217.66.224.15] X-Mailer: Palnet Webmail Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I didn't believe my eyes windows is better than FreeBSD.. can't be true - Original Message -- From: Matt Dillon To: Matthew Hagerty Send: 06:56 PM Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS : :Greetings, : :Here is a surprisingly unbiased article comparing OSes running hard core :network apps. The results are kind of disturbing, with FreeBSD (4.2) :coming in last against Linux (RH), Win2k, and Solaris (Intel). This is old. The guys running the tests blew it in so many ways that you might as well have just rolled some dice. There's a slashdot article on it too, and quite a few of the reader comments on these bozos are correct. I especially like comment #41. Don't worry, FreeBSD stacks up just fine in real environments. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message ___________________________________ Palnet Webmail, http://www.palnet.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message