Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:44:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 278477] x11-servers/xorg-server regression (?) - hardware brightness adjustment blocked in X (T400) Message-ID: <bug-278477-7141-hjLElqJO3F@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-278477-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-278477-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D278477 rkoberman@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rkoberman@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from rkoberman@gmail.com --- Sorry, but I can only guess at the meaning of "Fn + key do not five separa= te xev outputs so they are intercepted (?), similarly to LED light combination= ." Also, does backlight(1) work on the system? It should work with any interfa= ce that works with i915kms. That will not solve your problem, but says that brightness does work. On m T16, I use the following in /etc/devd/thinkpad.conf to get brightness = +- to work, but I am not sure that the values 0x10 and 0x11 are universal on ThinkPads. acpi_ibm.ko must be loaded. notify 100 { match "system" "ACPI"; match "subsystem" "IBM"; match "notify" "0x10"; action "/usr/bin/backlight +"; }; notify 100 { match "system" "ACPI"; match "subsystem" "IBM"; match "notify" "0x11"; action "/usr/bin/backlight -"; }; --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-278477-7141-hjLElqJO3F>