From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 14:32:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C48A16A4D0 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:32:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273E043F3F for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:32:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20031118223240011000nd00e>; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:32:40 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 95E793A; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:32:40 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3FB9B83D.90305@shaw.ca> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 18 Nov 2003 17:32:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3FB9B83D.90305@shaw.ca> Message-ID: <441xs5xq7r.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: RYAN vAN GINNEKEN Subject: Re: portsdb -uU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:32:42 -0000 RYAN vAN GINNEKEN writes: > getting this error for my portsdb -uU i just snipped part of it > because it is huge almost all the ports i would say. > Did a cvsup for all the ports and realized i did not have the space to > spare for them so did a rm -R * in the /usr/ports dir did another > cvsup just the ports i needed and now i get this horrible error my > cvsup file is also included in case it has something to do with things. If the dependency isn't there when the database is being built, portdb will complain (makes sense; you can't build that port without its dependencies, after all). It does, however, continue. So it makes sense that you would get a massive number of such complaints if you downloaded only a few categories of ports. If it's just the messages that are bothering you, redirect them to /dev/null when you build the portupgrade db.