Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:10:15 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Jonathan Horne <freebsd@dfwlp.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7B4 scheduling question Message-ID: <4777C2E7.1050702@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200712300953.40068.freebsd@dfwlp.com> References: <20071229223028.gkahh4fvggk4ccso@webmail.1command.com> <47778093.5070905@FreeBSD.org> <200712300953.40068.freebsd@dfwlp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Horne wrote: > On Sunday 30 December 2007 05:27:15 am Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Yes, ULE is the recommended scheduler. > > out of curiosity, if the ULE is becoming the standard, then why does the > GENERIC config still have the 4BSD as the default? Release engineers wanted to be conservative in case of problems. It will change post-release. > im curious to know, since im rebuilding a badly-behaving 7.0-RC1 box that was > locking up under the loads of building kernel. (installed at BETA4, now > building up to RC1 as i type...) Sounds likely to be hardware failure, absent other evidence. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4777C2E7.1050702>