From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 11:33:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9370106568F for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6298FC18 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn22 with SMTP id 22so1942137yxn.13 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.14.6 with SMTP id 6mr797199ybn.173.1314272024521; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5sm484906ybd.28.2011.08.25.04.33.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seibercom.net (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Rl3Ky0Mgwz2CG4y for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:33:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:33:41 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110825073341.3c302109@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4E562E66.3030001@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110825064354.029bc16a@seibercom.net> <4E562E66.3030001@FreeBSD.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: ruby port downgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:33:45 -0000 On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:13:42 -0400 Steve Wills articulated: > On 08/25/11 06:43, Jerry wrote: > > I probably missed it, but according to the "20110823:" entry in > > UPDATING, the ruby port was downgraded to 1.8. My first question is > > why? > > Only which version is installed by default is changed back. There are > ports for both 1.8 and 1.9. > > > Second, when checking on which version I have installed, this is > > the output: > > > > ruby --version > > ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [amd64-freebsd8] > > > > I therefore assume that I only have version 1.9 installed. Is that > > correct? > > Not necessarily, you may have ruby 1.8 installed also. > > > Third, is there really any reason to go though all that bullshit to > > downgrade to the previous version? I have not seen any problems > > occurring on my system. > > > > That's fine, you can keep that, just add RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9 to > /etc/make.conf. The more people we have testing 1.9 the better! That did not actually answer my question(s). Exactly why is the port being reverted to 1.8 as the default; and how can I positively ascertain if I both versions installed? -- Jerry ✌ jerry+ports@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________