From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 11:16:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA921065676; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E03B8FC1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6552086; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:57:20 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Sergey Babkin References: <7100389.65001215443113960.JavaMail.root@vms074.mailsrvcs.net> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:57:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7100389.65001215443113960.JavaMail.root@vms074.mailsrvcs.net> (Sergey Babkin's message of "Mon\, 07 Jul 2008 10\:05\:13 -0500 \(CDT\)") Message-ID: <86ej647ien.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: Proposal: a revoke() system call X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:16:52 -0000 Sergey Babkin writes: > Robert Watson writes: > > Seems like that conflicts with our existing revoke(2) system call. > Aha, I guess when I've checked, I've looked at a real old version of > FreeBSD. "real old", as in "three years before FreeBSD even existed"? revoke(2) was introduced in 4.3BSD Reno in 1990. BTW, could you please switch to a MUA that correctly inserts In-Reply-To: and / or References: headers? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no