From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 14:40:08 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A8B16A417 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C345913C4A5 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l8QEe8wt071267 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:40:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l8QEe8Ns071266; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:40:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:40:08 GMT Message-Id: <200709261440.l8QEe8Ns071266@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: Subject: Re: usb/91546: [umodem] [patch] Nokia 6630 mobile phone does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "M. Warner Losh" List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:40:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR usb/91546; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "M. Warner Losh" To: eugen@kuzbass.ru Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/91546: [umodem] [patch] Nokia 6630 mobile phone does not work Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:36:25 -0600 (MDT) In message: <20070926113201.GA1472@grosbein.pp.ru> Eugene Grosbein writes: : On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Warner Losh wrote: : : > My modem doesn't have a CM descriptor and I quirked it before. I : > moved the quirk code and it works now without it. The Union code : > from NetBSD didn't look relevant at all when you chased down all the : > things that it actually did, but maybe I missed something. : : > Given that umodem from current should just work on -stable w/o any : > changes (you may need ucom too, which does need one or two changes), : > it would be worth a shot at trying it. : : I've taken umodem.c,v 1.71 (no changes) and ucom.c,v 1.64 (one-line : change for ttycreate() call) from CURRENT, rebuild kernel modules : and tried - no luck, it's attached as ugen: : : umodem_get_desc: no CM desc : ugen2: Nokia Nokia E50, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 Thanks Eugen... I'll look at your earlier changes and a merge from NetBSD. Warner